PreprintMedicineReproducibility 36/100

Sample: Transparent Triage Models for Rural Clinic Wait Times

Preprint overview

This demonstration paper evaluates a simple interpretable triage model trained on synthetic rural clinic operations data. It highlights model cards, fairness checks, negative results, and reviewer-visible limitations for operational health research.

Preprint: Public immediately; not yet formally reviewed.

Published 2026-07-17Updated 2026-07-30

DOI: 10.5555/scienceorbit.demo.002

Cite
Citations
0
Endorsements
0
Versions
1
Reputation
+2

AI summary

Plain-English research brief

Author-approved

Problem

Clinics need simple ways to predict wait times without hiding decisions in opaque models.

What was discovered

The sample model helps in some settings but performs poorly during staffing shortages.

Key findings

  • Simple models can fail under staffing shocks.
  • Negative results are useful when limitations are visible.

Summaries are generated to improve accessibility. Authors review and approve them; always consult the full paper for technical detail.

Research assistant

AI research co-pilot

Answers are grounded in this paper's abstract and AI summary. Always verify against the full text.

Code & data integration

Automatic checks for linked repositories, datasets, and notebooks.

  • Code repositoryRepository URL could not be verified
  • DatasetDataset URL provided
  • NotebookNo notebook linked
  • ContainerNo container spec linked

Research predictions

Authors stake testable claims. Later, outcomes are scored for accountability.

No predictions registered yet.

Reproducibility index breakdown

26/100

Reproducibility not yet established

  • Code repositoryLinked but not verified reachable+8
  • Dataset linked+18
  • Notebook linked
  • Docker / container
  • Replication signalNot yet replicated
  • Replication attemptsNone yet
  • Reproducibility reviewsNone yet

Score rewards linked code/data, verification signals, and independent replication — not popularity.

Integrity screening

Pre-publish checks for statistical anomalies, template patterns, citation padding, and duplication signals.

Risk score: 4/100 · Passed

  • Synthetic-data disclosure

    Synthetic-data disclosure present

Full text

Abstract & reading

This demonstration paper evaluates a simple interpretable triage model trained on synthetic rural clinic operations data. It highlights model cards, fairness checks, negative results, and reviewer-visible limitations for operational health research.

triagehealth systemsfairnessinterpretable models

Cited

Sources

  1. 1.Mitchell et al. (2019), Model Cards for Model Reporting
  2. 2.WHO — Health systems governance

Structured, public peer review.

Statistical validitymedium confidence

Useful negative result with good disclosure

The synthetic-data disclosure is clear, and the failure mode under staffing shocks is exactly the kind of result worth publishing. A sensitivity table would make the limitations easier to scan.

Ada Mitchell · 2026-07-19

Related research

Connected by shared topics, tags, and fields.

ReviewedBiologyReproducibility 75/100Partially replicated

Sample: Mapping Coastal Wetland Carbon Recovery With Open Satellite Data

We combine open Sentinel imagery, field plots, and transparent uncertainty estimates to identify coastal wetlands with high carbon recovery potential. The sample workflow demonstrates how authors can attach datasets, code repositories, AI summaries, public review, and replication signals to a preprint.

remote sensingcarbonreproducibility

Ada Mitchell, Ben Carver

2 versions 1 reviews1 citations12 views